Photo 23 Sep 2 notes

Photo 18 Sep 5,579 notes

(Source: stupididiotboy)

Link 18 Sep 4,395 notes Grindr users on Scottish independence»

machotrouts:

I’ve spent the past couple of days asking several hundred Grindr users in Edinburgh whether they believe Scotland should be an independent country. Replies were of variable quality. Here is a representative sample:


image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

Not the usual sort of exit polling one aims for on Grindr.

Photo 10 Sep 210,009 notes drtanner:

chakrabot:

slitheringink:

artofcarmen:

fyeahwhovians:

raygender:

themediafix:

Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe

they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that

This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American

I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist.
In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites.
I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely.
Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well.

Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain.
-Morgan
P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able.

“ limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more
DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG.

As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier. 
This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet.
This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all.
Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay.

drtanner:

chakrabot:

slitheringink:

artofcarmen:

fyeahwhovians:

raygender:

themediafix:

Breaking news: The D.C. Appeals Court just killed Net Neutrality.

This could be the end of the Internet as we know it. But it doesn’t have to be. 

Tell the FCC to restore Net Neutrality: http://bit.ly/1iOOjoe

they want to make the internet like tv. with channels and paying to get to specific websites and things. net neutrality = not doing that

This impacts every internet user. Please signal boost the hell out of this and sign the petition if you are American

I do not reblog things like this very often, but this affects me both personally and my business as a freelance artist.

In the economy here; cash is already strapped as it is. You bet your ass companies would suck the ever living life out of misc. art sites.

I don’t want it to ever come down to me choosing between groceries or purchasing a new tier package via comcast to be able to access tumblr or DeviantArt (let alone not guaranteeing I’ll even be seen by my customer base since they may not want to pay out their asses either). It doesn’t seem important to most, but I do 90% of my business online entirely.

Please sign up, fight for this and share it with your followers/friends/family and urge them to give them hell as well.

Not writing related, but this is incredibly important. While we pay for service via ISPs, the internet has been a relatively free space where everyone, no matter their income level, is able to connect, access a wealth of information, and express themselves. The Internet has become a major part of our culture as human beings and the notion that ISPs might be able to limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more is utterly sickening. A lot of us are cash strapped as is, and I’d rather not be limited even more by someone else’s greed. Net Neutrality is essential and I hope you guys will understand why it needs to remain.

-Morgan

P.S. Signal boost this if you’re able.

“ limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more”

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

 limit what sites I can access unless I pay them more

DO YOU WANT THIS? NO?? CLICK THE LINK. REBLOG.

As I understand this ruling, it means that businesses now have to pay extra to ISPs to have access to their websites through that ISP provided at a reasonable speed. If you don’t pay, users’ access to your website will be slowed to a crawl - so independent people and small businesses can forget about getting onto that high speed access tier. 

This means that the American internet is going to be firmly under the control of those who have the most money. You’ll only get to see the content of those who can pay the ISPs to provide access at a reasonable speed. This means that you can expect to see skewed representation of just about everything, with those bigger businesses who can afford to pay ISPs a premium for access deciding what you can and cannot read, view and consume on the internet.

This is not something that we have in the UK. Our ISPs compete with each other to provide higher speeds, better services and lower prices, but because there’s a monopoly in the US of a few ISPs who provide services, they can afford to do this to you. You can’t go anywhere else, after all.

Everyone in the US needs to sign that petition, call their representatives, write angry letters and do whatever you can to tell your government that this ruling is Not Okay.

Photo 3 Sep 68,417 notes

(Source: tallpussy)

Text 26 Aug 12 notes

ohnocomics:

so grindr is like the gay version of tindr?

image

Text 14 Aug 1,077 notes "What’s the worst you have ever experienced as a gay man?"

gabrielgastelum:

Me: other gay men 

Photo 8 Aug 75 notes semiserious:

I’m a bit of a Grindr tease/troll. It’s not something I’m proud of. 
I stopped off for gas on my way from Boca back to Miami today, and saw this guy and wrote him “Wow.” He replied back, and I asked “What kind of bottom experiments are you looking to conduct?” 
He told me that he wanted to insert a condom full of skittles into my ass and eat them out one by one as his partner watched. And literally my only reply besides “ah” and “oh” was “I’m not even sure how that would work.” But then I asked “So, just Skittles and that’s it?” and he’s like “Then I want to come in you.” And I was like “haha, nope, sorry, don’t do bareback. Sorry. Bye.” And I was like, “…wait Kyle, you can let a guy go on about eating skittles out of your ass …but not about bareback sex. Would you let a man in clown makeup eat skittle out of your ass if it was safe sex? Hmm?” and I was just like, “I’m pretty sure I would not, but thanks for fucking me up by making me asks those sorts of question about myself.”
I didn’t ask for it, but he did send proof it was a 10 inch cock though. Good for him. Plus he’s got a partner. He’s got more going on for him than I do, really. 

semiserious:

I’m a bit of a Grindr tease/troll. It’s not something I’m proud of. 

I stopped off for gas on my way from Boca back to Miami today, and saw this guy and wrote him “Wow.” He replied back, and I asked “What kind of bottom experiments are you looking to conduct?” 

He told me that he wanted to insert a condom full of skittles into my ass and eat them out one by one as his partner watched. And literally my only reply besides “ah” and “oh” was “I’m not even sure how that would work.” But then I asked “So, just Skittles and that’s it?” and he’s like “Then I want to come in you.” And I was like “haha, nope, sorry, don’t do bareback. Sorry. Bye.” And I was like, “…wait Kyle, you can let a guy go on about eating skittles out of your ass …but not about bareback sex. Would you let a man in clown makeup eat skittle out of your ass if it was safe sex? Hmm?” and I was just like, “I’m pretty sure I would not, but thanks for fucking me up by making me asks those sorts of question about myself.”

I didn’t ask for it, but he did send proof it was a 10 inch cock though. Good for him. Plus he’s got a partner. He’s got more going on for him than I do, really. 

Video 5 Aug 1,641 notes

(Source: lindsavlohan)

Text 31 Jul 88 notes

simulatedcity:

Things got really ominous once straight people got grindr equivalents


Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.